Bodies That Matter: Science Fiction, Technoculture, and the Gendered Body

From Clockworks2
Revision as of 21:06, 8 November 2022 by Erlichrd (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Mitchell, Kaye. "Bodies That Matter: Science Fiction, Technoculture, and the Gendered Body." SFS #98 = 33.1 (March 2006): 109-128. As of November 2022, available on line here.[1]

The on-line version of the essay (as we found the on-line version) doesn't reprint the Abstract. It notes that "Bodies"

considers the possible intersections of recent technocultural and gender theory, focusing in particular on their respective theorizations of the body [..., working] from the premise that "the body" is to some extent the product of our understanding of it and concerns itself [... i.e., the essay concerns itself] with the relationship between the material and the discursive in the "production" of the body and with the reconceptualization and resignification of "matter" within technocultural and gender theory. Both of these theoretical discourses are moving towards an understanding of matter as constructed and nonnatural;[2] this emphasis on constructionism contrasts with earlier, more utopian views of the "transcendence" of the body in cyberspace and the radical gender possibilities of cyborgs. These ideas are then explored further via readings of Justina Robson's Natural History (2003) and Pat Cadigan's Tea from an Empty Cup (1998). These two sf novels reformulate the social and cultural meanings of the gendered body through their representations of sexually indeterminate, identity-shifting, hybrid, and radically other bodies. Science fiction, then, facilitates a dialogue between theories of technology and theories of gender, and tests the boundaries of the intelligible as far as our understanding of the gendered body is concerned. (print version p. 128)

Cyberspace: On the "'repudiation' or transcendence of the body in cyberspace," Mitchell argues "first that the body is not 'transcended' in cyberspace [...] but remain a factor that cannot be disregarded," that the body in cyberspace (and other VR?) encounters and transactions is "always already gendered, as is the technology" upon which these experiences rely" (hard-copy p. 111).

Cyborg(s): Responding to responses to



RDE, finishing, 7Nov22